During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Грудь напоказ и голые ягодицы.Кто из звезд оголился на «Оскаре»?3 марта 2025。业内人士推荐旺商聊官方下载作为进阶阅读
2024年12月20日 星期五 新京报，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
Ранее стало известно, что российские туристы массово отравились во Вьетнаме из-за нечистот в море. Соотечественники пожаловались на слив канализации в море на пляже Лонг-Бич острова Фукуок. Сообщается, что вся вода вдоль берега настолько грязная, что туристам сложно отстирать плавки и купальники после купания.
However, there are downsides to being in charge.